Thursday, May 21, 2020

Essay For College Experience - How To Write One

<h1>Essay For College Experience - How To Write One</h1><p>It is imperative to compose a paper for a school since it is a method of substantiating yourself to the college. You may have gone to secondary school for various years, however that doesn't promise you a spot at an esteemed college. To make it to an esteemed college, you should substantiate yourself scholastically and through an essay.</p><p></p><p>The exposition for the school experience is basically equivalent to that which you would have written in secondary school. A paper, however, is required as an assessment for admission to a lofty college. You may have been near it, yet it is the ideal opportunity for you to take a risk. The objective is to have the option to go to a four-year school with no problem.</p><p></p><p>The initial phase during the time spent composing a paper for the school experience is to plunk down and compose your destinations. You shou ld can consider how you need to assist your training. In your exposition you should portray the explanation behind why you are composing. Consider what you plan to pick up by presenting your essay.</p><p></p><p>Most of the time, individuals who are attempting to get into various colleges don't have great scholastic records. For this situation, the articles are the best wellspring of data to get back. In the school paper you should disclose why you need to go to your preferred school. You should underline on how your remarkable scholastic exhibition will assist your cohorts with improving. This will assist your cohorts with picking you as their scholastic friend and at last their school bound.</p><p></p><p>The subsequent stage during the time spent composing an article for the school experience is to expound on the experience that you had with the school that you have picked. This article should be made by the subject of the exposition. In this exposition you will be approached to depict the conditions that drove you to this school and why you needed to go to it. This is an awesome chance to become familiar with the institution.</p><p></p><p>Finally, you will be solicited to make an examination from the paper that you have composed. On the off chance that the exposition is formed by the theme that you have recorded, at that point the investigation ought to be that one. Be that as it may, you won't get an opportunity to be progressively innovative in light of the fact that this is required to cover the subject. Along these lines, the best thing that you can do is to utilize what is referenced in the exposition. In the event that you don't care for the parts, at that point you can overhaul it and clean it up with the goal that it will be a one of a kind and powerful essay.</p><p></p><p>Remember that school exposition is an outflow of who you are as an individual. It sh ows a genuine impression of your character and how you consider all the circumstances that you have confronted, alongside their outcome.</p>

Sunday, May 10, 2020

Why Should You Choose Jekyll and Hyde Essay Topics?

<h1>Why Should You Choose Jekyll and Hyde Essay Topics?</h1><p>The question of why and how to pick Jekyll and Hyde exposition subjects is significant. This article will examine this inquiry with you.</p><p></p><p>Jekyll and Hyde are two distinct characters who are likewise one character. I'm certain you've heard the anecdote about Shakespeare's Henry VIII and the different sides of him: The 'great' side (The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe) and the 'awful' side (The Winter's Tale). Similarly as Henry and his lady of the hour Mary Tudor fought until the very end, so too complete two individuals meet in a medical clinic bed; one turns into a co-character of the other.</p><p></p><p>When picking article points, it is useful to know the connection between the characters. In case you're expounding on a dad and child who were closest companions, maybe they are sweethearts; or they become unruly accomplices. The two characte rs are one of a kind since they have similar qualities yet additionally contrast. On the off chance that your exposition is based on these kinds of characters, they will be effectively recognizable.</p><p></p><p>Jekyll and Hyde are an extraordinary case of this. In this specific book, just one side really showed up. He was an appealing, enchanting, manipulative, attractive, articulate, beguiling, enticing and extremely tricky character. He assumed responsibility for what he needed. He had an immaculate social expertise and was outstandingly intelligent.</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, there was additionally the abhorrent side, which was another aspect of the character that drove him to control individuals. This side was a significant part of the plot. Henry was constantly mindful of this side, which regularly carried strife and sorrow to the in any case going great Hyde.</p><p></p><p>If you do a touch of research on these two characters, you will locate that one has been around for ages, and the other isn't excessively new. While the characters have changed, the connections despite everything stay consistent. Thus also do the contentions that exist between them.</p><p></p><p>There are various sides to the character. You may even decide to investigate every one of them with your expositions. The intensity of complexity, and the juxtaposition of two parts of yourself, can make a significant effect on your audience.</p><p></p><p>That's the reason Jekyll and Hyde exposition themes are great. Your article points can be analyzed from any edge, and you can be roused by the inconsistencies between the characters. Let your peruser see what you see in them.</p>

Friday, May 8, 2020

Essay Topics - Useful Essay Topics For High School Students

Essay Topics - Useful Essay Topics For High School StudentsAs you start searching for essay topics for the semester, you should not forget to do some research on them. This means that you have to make a list of the topics that will interest you. When writing your essay, it is better to consider about these topics when deciding how to write the paper.There are also some popular topics that are considered easy. These topics are also helpful for students who want to pass the subjects. For example, high school students always look for topics that are more traditional and interesting. They like topics which can be used in their future jobs.Sometimes, essay topics change as the times goes on. At the same time, it is recommended that you make a list of topics that will be useful to you in the future.If you need to use certain materials for your essay, then you have to make sure that these topics will provide you with the important things that you need. It will help you with preparing your p aper and gives you enough freedom to choose the right topic.For instance, if you know that the essay topic will be about the history of America, then you can include important information on the history of this country. You can include facts and interesting aspects from the history of America. In addition, you can also include certain features from the history of the United States.It is also important that you choose topics based on your research. As mentioned before, you should not focus only on one topic at a time. You should also get the advice of the professor or the teacher on your subject.Finally, before starting your essay topics, you should make sure that you have enough time for research. This means that you have to make sure that you have enough time for doing research. After all, this is the most important part of writing your essay.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Definition Of Democracy And Governance - 1586 Words

According to M.P.Barbra, local government means authority to determine and to execute matters within a restricted area inside and smaller than the whole state. Every state in the world has been implementing local government system for the administrating services regarding peripheral society. Local government and democracy is most closed concept in theory as well as practice. Term â€Å"democracy and governance† are complicated and dynamic concepts in social sciences discipline. It has a long historical background and goes back to human history. Ancient Athens politics and their philosophy has provided main base for those concepts and practical perspectives. There is no a concrete definition or interpretation about democracy or governance. Many scholars have presented different kind of definitions and interpretations based on their own perspectives. But, modern conceptual meaning of democracy and governance mainly depends on liberal democratic principles such as equality, participation, freedom, liberty etc. Therefore, definition of democracy and governance are depends on the social and political context of the society. Local democracy is the most important aspect of the democratic governance, because it will give a holistic view of the nature of democratic practices and governance of the whole society. Further, it will be reflected form the local government and there governing process of the given country. On the other hand, governance, administration, policy initiation processShow MoreRelatedThe Good Society By Alan Draper And Ansil Ramsay1206 Words   |  5 PagesOur class has been focused since day one about â€Å"good governanceà ¢â‚¬ . There are many definitions as to what good governance could look like. It could change from country to country, all the way down to person to person. Someone in Iran is more likely to say the way the Iranians govern is better than the United States than someone anywhere else. There are some generally accepted guidelines, but some other institutions have a different focus. In class, we have read from multiple sources, such as â€Å"The GoodRead MoreGood Governance and Human Rights1107 Words   |  4 PagesIntroduction Good governance and human rights are considered as key ingredients to economic growth. Nowadays few, if any, politicians and political scientists alike, would deny that democracy (good governance and human rights) and economic development are correlated. This link has long been argued as indispensible to the development of the African continent and that the African countries should embrace the â€Å"Rule of Law† in as far as good governance and human rights within their constitutionalRead MorePolitical Science And Its Influence On The Country s Current Situation Essay985 Words   |  4 Pagescan be democracy or government as well, in order to aware us about our surroundings, and our place in it. When we acquire enough knowledge on a subject, we study the strings between them in order to better explain the political consequences, such as: why people vote for one political party rather than voting another, why governments and politics differ in different countries, or why wars happen in some cases while they are avoided in other cases. This paper contains the concept governance, good governanceRead MoreGood Governance in Pakistan1667 Words   |  7 PagesGood Governance in Pakistan. OUTLINES: 1. Introduction 2. Definition of Governance 3. Governance in Pakistan. 4. Failures of Governance in Pakistan 5. Causes of failures: 1. Political commotion 2. No democratic setup 3. Military intrusion 4. Feudal indulgence 5. Massive Corruption 6. Constitutional crises 7. Institutional clashes 8. Mismanagement of resources 9. Lack of Accountability 10. Over Exploitation of funds 11. Restrictions on media 12. Ethnic conflicts 13. Secterianism 14. Extremism 6 EssentialsRead MoreWhy Is Islamic Democracy?913 Words   |  4 Pagesunderstand exactly what I mean when discussing Islamic democracy. Essentially, the only democracy that we in the west know is western democracy. This democracy is what the textbooks teach, and while it is perfectly functioning in our society, it may not be the same in nations which are not functioning in the same framework that we are so familiar with. That is to say, it cannot be expected for a Muslim nation to willingly and easily accept western democracy, and as is eloquently summed up in this statementRead MoreDoes Democracy Produce Worse Government Than Dictatorship Produces?1194 Words   |  5 PagesQuestion: Does democracy produce worse government than dictatorship produces? Introduction For the sake of ruling a country, we demand a system which can provide justice and also protect the basic rights of people. Basically, there are two systems in the contemporary world, democratic system and dictatorship. When people determining which form of government is better, it always comes to a fierce debate. For instance, America, United Kingdom, India are the countries which have a democratic formRead MoreDemocracy As A Best Solution, And Underlying Capitalist Forces1490 Words   |  6 PagesDemocracy has morphed in the face of time due to exterior forces which in turn have impacted the understanding of what democracy in action should look like. Technology, education, religious decay and rise, and many other facets of modern life have overwhelmed the understanding of what democracy is. Simply engaging with the concept of democracy is in itself an acceptance of values and assumptions about what governments, and many times economies, should look like. But this paper hardly allo ws for alternativeRead MoreIn General Terms, Democracy Is Characterized As A Government1504 Words   |  7 PagesIn general terms, democracy is characterized as a government in which citizens have the capabilities to exercise political autonomy to influence the affairs of the state. To be more precise, citizens are able to exercise direct control over the government—as in the case of pure democracies—or they are able to exercise indirect control—as in the case of representative democracies. Of course this general characterization is an oversimplification of what a democracy is and precisely how it functionsRead MoreIs Electoral Participation Necessary For Political Participation?1538 Words   |  7 PagesDemocracy is the rule of the people, therefore, for it to be at its full potential, citizens must participate in the decision-making process. However, for a large part of the public, political participation does not go beyond electoral participation. Nonethele ss, even the most common form of political engagement, namely voting, is in decline (Whiteley, 2012, pp.37-38). Although electoral participation is not the ultimate measure of political participation, it is one of the most significant and easiestRead MoreGood Governance and Role of Public Servant1644 Words   |  7 PagesGOOD GOVERANCE AND ROLE OF PUBLIC SERVANT Outlines: 1. Introduction 2. Definition of Good Governance 3. Characteristics of Good Governance 4. Importance of Good Governance 5. Good Governance in Pakistan 6. Public Servant and its role for Good Governance 7. Conclusion Governance is not a new concept. It is, as old as, human civilization. Governance has various forms and manifestations according to varied and diversified needs and gigantic challenges with ever changing circumstances

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Heroes and Villains Presented Essay Example For Students

Heroes and Villains Presented Essay In The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes by Arthur Conan Doyle. There are many different villains all with similar characteristics but with key differences. These villains are presented in various ways and all bring something new to the stories.  In The Speckled Band we are introduced to Dr Grimesby Roylott. Right from the start it is plain that he is a fearful man. He follows the pattern for stereotypical villains. His very appearance is marked with an evil passion. He is intimidating as he is described as so tall his hat actually brushed the cross bar of the doorway. This follows a very typical pattern for villains as they often are scary and intimidating and this makes him seem more villainous. We know he is cunning as well from the description of his appearance when he is described as resembling a fierce bird of prey. This shows he is cunning as birds of prey are usually very cunning and clever. Also it also tells gives us an idea of how fierce he can be. He is also a very strong man which adds to the intimidation as we know he is clearly a dangerous man to mess with. We know he does not care about how other people see him and possibly enjoys being the terror of the village having no friends at all, save the wandering gypsies. The way he speaks show confidence as he believes that he induces fear as he tells Sherlock to keep out of my grip. His actions speak louder than words though as he is a very violent and often uncontrollable in his anger. This is shown when he hurled the local blacksmith. Showing his strength and inability to control himself. He uses his actions to emphasize his point that he is dangerous as he seized the poker from the fire and bent it into a curve. He believes by showing his strength he can scare Holmes from meddling in his affairs. In The Copper Beeches we meet a very different villain to Roylott. Mr Rucastle follows a very different type of villainy relying entirely on his cunning and intelligence in order to outwit those who would try to stop him. Unlike Roylott when we first meet Rucastle it is unclear that he is the villain. He seems very friendly and pleasant and doesnt seem to follow many stereotypes for villains as he is A prodigiously stout man with a very smiling face and a great heavy chin. He is not intimidating and acts very pleasantly in order to hide his villainous qualities. We can tell from the way he is described that he is very good at appearing like a perfectly good person. However he perhaps overacts it and gives a lot away from this. As upon hearing about his proposition to Miss Hunter, Holmes says how no sister of his should have ever accepted such an offer. However none the less he covers his motive well enough to still appear quite friendly. However he changes quite drastically later on in the story. When he becomes annoyed he is a completely different person going from smiling in the most pleasant fashion until his eyes were just to shining slits to being so angry that his cheek were red, his brow was all crinkled with anger and the veins stood out on his temples with passion. This shows a totally different side of Rucastle which shows his true villainy. However he is very cunning and attempts to hide it and even spoke in a jesting tone although no matter how he tries he is unable to suppress his rage as there was no jest in his eyes. This is a demonstration of how he is keen to hide his villainy and how although he has been able to do this up until this point we know he is clearly very annoyed as he was unable to hide it this time. However he does then show himself as a villain fully with no attempts to hide it as In an instant his smile hardened into a grin of rage. .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5 , .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5 .postImageUrl , .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5 , .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5:hover , .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5:visited , .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5:active { border:0!important; } .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5:active , .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5 .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .udea13fb21916c17d5aa92129461f43f5:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Angela’S Ashes EssayThis shows that he is keen to get his point across and wants Miss Hunter to know that although he appears to have been kind and friendly up until know he is very serious and extremely angry and does not want her in the turret. Even going as far as too threaten to through her to the mastiff. During the most part he tries to hide what makes him a villain with very friendly actions. He told her some of the funniest stories she had ever heard and spent most of the time smiling in the most amiable manner. This shows just how good he was at covering up his darker side.

Friday, April 17, 2020

Should Marijuana Be Legalized Essay Example

Should Marijuana Be Legalized ? Essay The opinion of Marijuana during the 70’s was much more definitive than it is today. Approval of Marijuana by 27 states, new medical studies, and its consequences on those convicted from use of the most common illicit drug in the world, is forcing the United States of America to rethink its stance on the matter. In general, the underlying argument about Marijuana in this country is: should Marijuana continue to be prohibited to citizens based on its health effects, medicinal values, and costs to the country? The reasons why this argument is so important are great. As previously stated, Marijuana is the most commonly used illegal drug in the world, and with millions of people using it regularly and almost 100 million that have ever used it in this country, the laws behind this drug hold great influence. It is because of this and the immergence of new evidence, that the justification behind prohibition of this drug is being rethought scientifically, socially, and economically. The use of Marijuana as both medicine and a recreational drug is being thoroughly questioned in the US. 7 states have Marijuana approved in some form, many of those for medical purposes however those users can still, and do get placed into prison by federal law. Currently, 830,00 people a year are in trouble with the law in regards to Marijuana and numbers seem to be on an uphill trend . Furthermore, the US invests 30 billion a year into the drug war, half of which is dedicated to Marijuana. Many are questioning its success all together. Both imprisonment and the war cost our country, and therefore our people, money. A change in laws is going to have a dramatic affect on America. We will write a custom essay sample on Should Marijuana Be Legalized ? specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Should Marijuana Be Legalized ? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Should Marijuana Be Legalized ? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Marijuana comes from the Cannabis Sativa plant. Its discovery could have been as early as 2700 BC in China. Despite the Cannabis Sativa plant producing Marijuana it also produces hemp, which is a very useful cash crop that can produce several textile materials. Aside from hemp, Marijuana was used in America up until 1937, when it was banned by 47 states as a result of increased usage due to the 1920 amendment that outlawed alcohol. People no longer having access to alcohol went elsewhere for a recreational substance. What causes the â€Å"buzz† users feel from Marijuana is a result of its entry into the bloodstream, and the binding of THC from Marijuana with brain receptors that cause the feelings of drowsiness, increased appetite, giddiness, hallucinations, and other effects. In 1965 President Johnson passed the drug abuse control amendment targeting all illicit drugs, and then in 1969 President Nixon declared an all out war on drugs and crime, giving birth to what would become the drug war we see today. In 1996, California became the first state to legalize medical Marijuana, setting off a significant trend through the country. Today Marijuana is classified as a schedule I drug alongside Heroin, Cocaine, and Morphine, (this classification has been unchanged since the 1960’s). It was classified as a schedule I drug despite the fact that it was recommended by the CSA (controlled substances act) task force to not place it in this class. While certain states in the US currently allow medical Marijuana use, the Federal Government claims that their law overrules state law and therefore users of the medical Marijuana can be prosecuted. Certain concepts need to be understood in order for the information presented to be interpreted properly. This argument covers legalization for medical and/or recreational use of Marijuana. This argument does not pertain to the legalization of all illegal drugs. This argument is not about Marijuana being healthy or good for anyone; however it is more focused towards its use in the medical field and its health effects in comparison to already legal substances. A few terms presented in the argument need to be understood. Marijuana is created when the leaves and female flowers of the hemp plant are dried, and it is commonly used but not limited to use in cigarette form. THC or Tetrahydrocannabinol is the primary intoxicant of marijuana. Aside from the technical, there are a few legal terms as well. When the term decriminalization is used, what is proposed is the elimination of criminal penalties for marijuana, meaning that in most cases possession (with certain restrictions) would be treated as a civil offense and maximum charges could be a fine of a few hundred dollars. Decriminalization insures no prison time or creation of a criminal record. Marijuana legalization is simply the complete government authorization of the substance. The Drug War is the resulting conflict between law enforcement and those who deal in illegal drugs. There are three major topical issues in the argument over marijuana legalization. First, does possess medical value? Second, is Marijuana harmful enough to remain illegal and how does it compare to other legal illicit substances? And lastly, what is Marijuana’s effect on our nation and how would legalization change this? Of the three issues related to the Marijuana legalization debate, Marijuana and its medical use might be the most widely discussed of them all. Opponents of Medical Marijuana bring up any significant arguments as to why it should not be condoned. The American Medical Association in 2001 stated that Marijuana should remain a schedule 1 drug, primarily basing their decision on the fact that they do not believe it has any medical value and that it has â€Å"no accepted medical use† and possesses a â€Å"high potential for abuse†. The FDA has a specifi c process in which the joint medical and scientific communities conduct certain procedures to determine whether drugs can be considered safe and effective as medicine, and Marijuana has not been approved by this process. The government also insists that Marijuana supporters are using the medical Marijuana â€Å"angle† as a ploy to get the whole drug legalized for recreational use, a valid point that definitely stirs up some question. Also, the countries that permit the drug to be used medicinally have not produced conclusive research on Marijuana’s applications in medicine. Opponents also justify Marijuana’s prohibition with the decision that if the FDA hasn’t approved it, it must be too dangerous to use. They also emphasize the fact that they believe that Marinol, a synthetic form of THC, can be used as an alternative to Marijuana and makes the whole plant unnecessary. After all, certain studies did show that smoking five joints of Marijuana a week may be equivalent to smoking a full pack of cigarettes daily, in terms of the amount of cancer causing chemical Marijuana contains. Opponents against Marijuana legalization for all purposes believe that it is harmful to the users and therefore should remain illegal. One of the most famous points made by prohibitionists is that Marijuana is a gateway drug and leads to harder drugs. They also argue that Marijuana contains up to 25% of THC today, compared to a miniscule 3% in the 1960s. This clearly indicates an increased potency in the intoxicating chemical. It has been scientifically proven that THC is stored in body fat, so some believe that it is possible that regular smokers could have enough stored in their system to be â€Å"sedated† at all times. There was a test conducted by a Dr. Robert Heath on monkeys that revealed THC in Marijuana caused that serious brain damage. Opponents also claim that long-term use has shown changes in the brain similar to those seen from other drugs. Alterations in nerve cells have indicated an affect towards the subject’s motivation, which could possibly explain one of the commonly used arguments against Marijuana. The risk of heart attack also quadruples during the first hour smoking, and blood pressure also rises. Prohibitionists contend that smokers become more susceptible to respiratory illnesses, increased phlegm production, chest illnesses, lung infections and cancer of the head and neck. These prohibitionists also state that Marijuana smoke has 50-70 percent more carcinogens than tobacco smoke, making it possibly more harmful than cigarettes. They also claim that smoking reduces the immune system’s ability to fight disease. Another very important aspect of their argument is that despite Marijuana not following the characteristics of a substance that causes true addiction, there still has been signs of addictive potential for users. These include irritability and sleeplessness among others. One of the most overlooked issues in the legalization debate is the influence of Marijuana prohibition to our economy. The opponents of legalization justify the costs of prohibition with the main point that our society would be negatively affected if legalized. Firstly, they feel that if legalized the danger of Marijuana will be misinterpreted by the public and would ultimately increase the potential for abuse. They are also convinced that we would see a crime rate increase on a nation-wide scale if Marijuana was no longer prohibited and was allowed to the public. Prohibitionists also insist that a drug market would still exist for miners, and that decriminalization would increase the usage of the drug. If it will be allowed medically, they believe it would also be accepted recreationally on false grounds. In regards to Marijuana and its medical value, proponents of legalization believe that Marijuana meets the FDA criteria as a substance in which the benefits outweigh its risk. This is considered to be a guiding principle when the FDA makes a decision towards approving a substance for medicinal use. Three different US government studies have shown that Marijuana may have medical value. The most recent of these was a one million dollar study by the Institute of Medicine. Many claim that Marinol, a synthetic form of THC, abolishes the need for Marijuana to be used as medicine, but it has been shown that it is just not as effective as smoking. Furthermore, there are other chemicals in Marijuana that help patients in ways that Marinol cannot. Another problem with Marinol is that takes quite a long time to begin working, costs more than Marijuana, and leaves the patient intoxicated for much too long of a time span (about 8-12 hours). Marinol is ingested in pill form, but many that use Marijuana to suppress nausea and vomiting find hat swallowing pills are counter-productive to this problem. This is due to the fact that the pills get vomited out because they simply take too long to work, entirely defeating the purpose of taking the medicine. On top of this, proponents also argue that the US is becoming increasingly alone in Marijuana persecution. Currently the Netherlands regulates Marijuana; and Belgium embraces it as medicine and is also considering leg alization for recreational use as well. New Zealand and Australia are also following the trend and are considering it for medical use. Proponents also argue the issue of whether Marijuana is in fact harmful, or more harmful than the already illegal illicit substances such as alcohol or tobacco, quite fervently. They state that there is not one documented record of anyone ever dying from Marijuana consumption, while the same cannot be said for alcohol and tobacco. They also argue that Marijuana should not be classified as a schedule I drug alongside heroin and cocaine etc. because it is simply much more mild and less harmful of a drug, even less harmful than alcohol and tobacco. Supporters also emphasize that Marijuana does not damage the brain as many have claimed, it simply increases the activity of the brain related to alpha waves, which is what causes the relaxed, meditative, and creative states that make up the â€Å"high† feeling. Advocates of legalization claim that it is simply untrue that Marijuana is more potent now than it was, enforcing the fact that poor storage in evidence rooms during the 70s caused a decline in potency results on tests and that Marijuana is the same now as it was in the 70s. Proponents also combat the claims that Marijuana impairs memory by stating that the impairment only occurs while intoxicated, and that the studies related to this were misleading people into believing that damage was permanent when in fact it was temporary. Supporters admit that Marijuana contains 1,000 chemicals but negate those claims with the example that coffee contains 800 chemicals that scientists consider to be volatile and only 21 of the 800 have been tested on animals. Proponents also justify Marijuana’s harmlessness with the fact that it takes 40,000 times the amount needed for intoxication in order for someone to die from Marijuana, while it only takes 4-10 times the amount for one to consume a lethal dose of alcohol. There was also a commercial TV ad from the Partnership for a Drug-Free America that aired in the late 90s that was a â€Å"flat out lie. † When researchers complained about the validity of the ad that demonstrated how Marijuana flattens brain waves it got pulled from the air. Advocates of Marijuana legalization also insist that most of the arguments held against marijuana are those in regards to respiratory harm (comparable to cigarette smoking), and that they can be abolished by the many alternative methods for Marijuana use which include vaporization, or the consumption of cannabis in certain foods, to name a few. Many recognize Marijuana prohibition as a large burden to our economy, and proponents of legalization state that this burden would be removed if Marijuana was legalized and regulated by the government. According to many, America is waging a very expensive and seemingly ineffective war on drugs that is costing our nation 30 billion a year. Half of this cost goes towards the prohibition of Marijuana, so if legalized, Marijuana supporters deduce that we would reduce the cost of the drug war by roughly 50 percent. Proponents of legalization also emphasize that based on those statistics we would be spared 15 billion a year, which could be used more constructively. The drug war causes 830,000 arrests a year for Marijuana related charges, which is costly and is considered to be an unjust punishment by many. Proponents and economists both purpose that our economy could benefit from legalization (regulation), and commonly use Holland as an example. Holland earns 67. 5 million a year from Marijuana, most of which is locally grown, also providing hemp products that pump revenue into their economy. If the Government regulated and taxed Marijuana, similar numbers could be seen. Currently through taxation alone, tobacco and alcohol bring in 11. 4 million annually to the government, and Marijuana would be believed to show similar return. Proponents also argue that Marijuana prohibition is a burden not only to our economy, but also to our society, and that regulation of the substance could fix all of this. The arrests of 830,000 people a year ruin the lives for many, stamping them with criminal records that they forever carry with them. Because Marijuana contributes to half of the drug war, if legalized half the drug dealers would be out of work and as result our society can expect to see a 50% reduction in crime related to the drug war. Proponents insist that regulated substances would actually cause a decrease in use, as can be ascertained by the fact that only 4% of Holland’s population uses Marijuana, where 7% of our population is comprised of users. Not only does Holland have fewer users than America, but since Marijuana has been legalized, the usage of hard drugs have actually decreased amongst the people of the Dutch nation. And finally, studies are showing that treatment is shown to be seven times more cost effective than criminal interjection for drug matters. It is these crucial points that drive the arguments of proponents. To summarize this entire debate the underlying views of both the proponents and opponents of these three issues involving the legalization of Marijuana must be restated. Opponents of the first issue, whether Marijuana has medical value or not, believe that it simply possesses no medical use and can be avoided with synthetic alternatives to the plant itself. They also believe that there is not enough research disproving their theory in order for them to reconsider its prohibition for medical use. Proponents, on the other hand, believe that there is conclusive research made by several studies proving that Marijuana can help the ill. They also believe that it meets the criteria necessary for it to be labeled as a â€Å"medicine. † Is Marijuana harmful enough to remain legal and how does it compare to the two recreational substances alcohol and tobacco? This is the second major issue, or question that needs to be answered. Opponents believe that Marijuana possesses enough threat to humans that it should remain illegal, while the supporters of legalization combat those claims with the presentation of more modern research and new discoveries that jeopardize its current status as a harmful, illegal drug. The third issue in this debate is, how would Marijuana legalization affect our nation? Opponents believed that society would be affected negatively and see increased crime rate, and drug use among other things. Proponents believed the opposite of this, using statistics and testimony to predict the positive outcome of legalization. Based on extensive researching and intense analysis of both sides of the argument, I believe without a doubt that there is no reason to keep imprisoning those who use Marijuana in our country. The fact is, that prohibitionists have an outdated ideology toward the matter, and what they believe is either based on false evidence from inferior scientific studies, or simply the result of nation-wide naivety that has rubbed off on them. As we progress and progress into the 21st century it is becoming clearer and clearer that Marijuana is just-as-if-not less harmful than alcohol and tobacco. The government funded studies and advertisements that reach the public eye is misleading and to blatant, more fictional than the comic strip on the back of the Daily Star. I cannot say why the government insists on driving this propaganda machine forward or turning the other cheek as more and more states by way of democracy decide to decriminalize Marijuana, but I can only speculate that it is because of a few key political figures that reap profits from the drug war and that half the DEA would have nothing to do. Science is proving Marijuana to be quite harmless, and if you ask anyone that has broken what is possibly the most ridiculous law of our time and has tried Marijuana, they would probably tell you that they agree. We need to leave be the people that would rather choose to sit down after work and smoke a joint than drink a bear. The drug war costs tens of billions, and is an absolutely cataclysmic failure. If legalized, our indebted economy would be spared millions, innocents would no longer be unjustly imprisoned, our crime would be reduced, and Marijuana would no longer be able to be obtained by innocent adolescents, instead by adults who have the right to choose for themselves whether they should use this nature-grown plant or not. Marijuana should be legalized for all purposes and anyone that semi-educated or possesses half a brain would probably agree with me. At the very least we need the poor, innocent patients, (most of which whom are elderly and terminally ill), to be able to take the medicine that provides them any amount of relief from both the physiological and psychological pain that they bear, without having to worry about the risk of possibly being arrested or imprisoned alongside murderers, rapists, and lunatics. These prohibitionist laws need to be changed before more people suffer from the consequences of this insanity.

Saturday, March 14, 2020

Electrocute

Electrocute Electrocute Electrocute By Maeve Maddox The verb electrocute was coined in the late nineteenth century on the model of execute in the sense of â€Å"to inflict capital punishment upon.† Unlike execute, which has a legitimate Latin etymology, electrocute is a portmanteau word. H. W. Fowler (A Dictionary of Modern English Usage) held it in disdain: This word does not claim classical paternity; if it did, it would indeed be a barbarism. It is merely a portmanteau word formed by telescoping electro- and execution, and, as it is established, protest is idle.† Fowler was writing about forty-five years after Buffalo, New York dentist Alfred P. Southwick invented the electric chair in 1881 as a more humane method than hanging. The first person to be executed by electrocution was William Kemmler (1860-1890). The newness of the word is apparent in the two earliest OED citations, dated 1889 and 1890: He wants to be ‘electrocuted’ The gentlemanshould be ‘electrocuted’ By 1903, the word was in use without enclosing quotation marks. The OED includes a second definition of electrocute as â€Å"to give an electric shock to† and includes this citation from an Australian source: I was electrocuted. I can still smell the flesh burning. American usage, however, does not allow for the survival of an electrocuted person. Merriam-Webster offers two definitions: 1. to put to death as a legal punishment by causing a fatally large electric current to pass through the body. 2. to kill by electric shock. The following examples from the Web illustrate nonstandard (US) usage: I was trying to unplug my cell phone charger and got my fingers too close to the bottom. They touched the prongs and I got electrocuted! I electrocuted myself three times trying to unplug my laptop charger. Teenage friends electrocuted trying to take selfie on top of  train (The girls were severely injured, but, as they survived, they were not electrocuted.) Paul Brians (Common Errors in English Usage) summarizes US usage this way: To electrocute is to kill using electricity. If you live to tell the tale, you’ve been shocked, but not electrocuted. For the same reason, the phrase â€Å"electrocuted to death† is a redundancy. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the General category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:Compared "to" or Compared "with"?Between vs. In BetweenA "Diploma" is not a "Degree"